A Napa city council member is asking whether a youth curfew would help
derail gang violence in the area.
What are your thoughts on the idea? Add them below.
Suze wrote on
Feb 13, 2008 6:09 PM:
" Some good and varied points being voiced here, but my feeling is
that any kind of discipline is better than none. Have you checked
out how many cars get broken into each month! Maybe 11pm is a bit
more realistic than 10pm, but if our Police are cruising around
looking for these kids, then something good is going to come out of
it. As for the gangs, I think it is time we got really tough and
investigate the legal residency status in all gang related arrests.
If they are not legal then boot them out pronto. These Latino gangs
are a serious degredation in our society. "
napagirl1960 wrote on
Feb 13, 2008 2:59 PM:
" we have one, and have for years!!! it was here in the 70's, but
has NEVER been inforced. we don't need a new one, just inforce the
existing....duh "
kevin wrote on
Feb 13, 2008 12:46 PM:
" It's a waste of law enforcement's time and our tax money, though I
am sure the police would prefer to be arresting teenagers "crusing
the J" instead of performing dangerous police work... "
yes wrote on
Feb 13, 2008 12:29 PM:
" a curfew won't work!! They will do what they please but they'll
just do it earlier
jeepracer10 wrote on
Feb 13, 2008 11:11 AM:
" many other cities in the Bay Area have such curfews in place, but
the gang activity and shootings still happen. The police need to be
more vigilant in contacting these groups. Immigration can also be
used to extradite gang members that are here illegally. "
JimClark wrote on
Feb 13, 2008 10:31 AM:
" Um, if our one time Police Chief denied the problem, it could have
been eradicated a long time ago. The discouraging of a problem
discourages those who might be the cause of it.
Since that didn't happen, there needs to be extremely strong
measures to eliminate it. The ACLU and other whiners be d***ed. I
have no doubt that Law Enforcement knows who the majority of these
miscreants are.
Maybe it is time to reign them in and watch gang related crime
decrease exponentially. "
d wrote on
Feb 13, 2008 9:19 AM:
" Gang members KILL people. Why would they be worried about a
curfew? If they were afraid of the law they wouldn't be hurting
people in the first place. My brother is a 16 year old jr. who
starts on the varsity football team for VHS. Has good grades & good
friends. He and my parents would giggle at the thought of him having
to be home by 10 on the weekends. My parents will not enforce that
curfew because they have trust for him and for his friends and until
they lose that trust, nothing is going to change. & lets be honest,
even if our parents did care, I wouldn't have listened my senior
year. There are movies that start at 10, some of the football games
don't even get over untill about that time and who doesnt go to In
and Out after the game?! There are going to be MANY teenagers who
will not follow the curfew & many parents who won't enforce it. If
this curfew is REALLY for teenagers involved in gang activity then
HELLO!! These teens are killing other kids. These teens are using
things like guns, knives, and bats. These teens are using drugs and
drinking. A parent that pays any attention to their teen would
notice when their teens are doing things like this. You smell the
alchol and the smoke. There are sick in the bathroom the next
morning after a long night. Most gang members in this area are in
either red or blue. Only one or the other, they NEVER wear both. If
you look through their belongings you find gang related music,
colored belts/rags and drawings. If parents can't stop what their
teen is already doing then why would they be able to have there kids
home by10?!! "
pharper wrote on
Feb 13, 2008 8:39 AM:
" I hate to break this to everyone, but, being a teenager and closer
to the issue than most adults are (a teenager who doesn’t, by the
way, participate in gang activity), I know that most gangbangers
(the REAL ones, not the people walking around in baggy pants) are
not even in school--they're in their early twenties and up. I don't
see how a curfew on the younger people of the community would make
us safer from the twenty-year-olds who are causing the trouble.
Making a curfew would only punish the city's youth for crimes they
didn't commit. I'm willing to acknowledge the fact that not all
teenagers make good decisions, and there are those troublemakers and
gang members. But that's like punishing the whole generation when
only one person is misbehaving. "
Exasperated wrote on
Feb 13, 2008 7:12 AM:
" YES! I agree with musikluvr! Of course, the ACLU and the rest of
the liberals will say a curfew will hurt teenagers' feelings and
violate their rights. When did we all stop putting safety first? "
Dhappel54 wrote on
Feb 13, 2008 6:49 AM:
" A curfew is not the answer--or, at best, onlya small part of one.
This town has fewer productive opportunities for young people than
anyplace I've been. We need social outlets for youthful energy
(sports, entertainment, volunteerism) more than (or at least as
much) as repression! But, of course, planning and providing for
these opportunities takes time, thought and even money. Much easier
to just bash the kids. "
musikluvr wrote on
Feb 13, 2008 5:42 AM:
" Idle hands are the devil's playground. There is no reason for a
person under 18 to be out after 10PM without adult supervision. "